<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Throng #4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:30:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5829</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/#comment-5829</guid>
		<description>Public policy think tanks should be able to use an organizational blog to float, test and discuss policy research and ideas. Like this string of comments,such an organizational blog could expand the community of interest in a particular subject. That might mean more consensus-driven individual points of view. Even though the discussion my blogged comments raise has always been -- shall we say -- relatively restrained, it does inform my views and helps knit the texture of my ideas. That can&#039;t help but make more interesting and valuable &quot;policy&quot;. So, public policy organizations should do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public policy think tanks should be able to use an organizational blog to float, test and discuss policy research and ideas. Like this string of comments,such an organizational blog could expand the community of interest in a particular subject. That might mean more consensus-driven individual points of view. Even though the discussion my blogged comments raise has always been &#8212; shall we say &#8212; relatively restrained, it does inform my views and helps knit the texture of my ideas. That can&#8217;t help but make more interesting and valuable &#8220;policy&#8221;. So, public policy organizations should do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Hofmann</title>
		<link>http://www.webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5776</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hofmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/#comment-5776</guid>
		<description>It was great meeting everyone yesterday! Thanks for organizing it, Doug and Lisa. I am looking forward to the next one.

I don&#039;t think blogs and wikis are ideal to create public policy. But they can be used to generate ideas before it gets to the policy creation stage and they can be great sounding boards before making a final decision. But, to Maggie&#039;s point, I agree that it boils down to leadership. And I think there is inherit danger in trying to decide issues by &quot;pile ons&quot; - even if the subject lends itself to it.

-- Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was great meeting everyone yesterday! Thanks for organizing it, Doug and Lisa. I am looking forward to the next one.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think blogs and wikis are ideal to create public policy. But they can be used to generate ideas before it gets to the policy creation stage and they can be great sounding boards before making a final decision. But, to Maggie&#8217;s point, I agree that it boils down to leadership. And I think there is inherit danger in trying to decide issues by &#8220;pile ons&#8221; &#8211; even if the subject lends itself to it.</p>
<p>&#8211; Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie fox</title>
		<link>http://www.webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5761</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/#comment-5761</guid>
		<description>Hey - so nice to meet everyone, and thanks a bunch for the invite. Sorry I missed the discussion about using social media to build consensus. I am reminded of when ZeFrank set up a wiki to allow his viewers to write an entire episode of The Show. It was &lt;i&gt;definitely&lt;/i&gt; a case of too many chefs - and of course public policy is infinitely more complicated.

I suppose the issue boils down to leadership - to create great policy, you have to have a great leader that inspires the policymakers. Leadership provided, ultimately, by one person. I think, as you suggest, blogs break down and devolve the issue into so many little pieces and opinions that it&#039;s improbable that one person (or even a committee) could to put it all back together again. That being said, the feedback provided via blogs can definitely, in broad strokes, provide insight into issues that, as Jonathan says, &quot;resonate with their constituents&quot;.

See you in January!
M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; so nice to meet everyone, and thanks a bunch for the invite. Sorry I missed the discussion about using social media to build consensus. I am reminded of when ZeFrank set up a wiki to allow his viewers to write an entire episode of The Show. It was <i>definitely</i> a case of too many chefs &#8211; and of course public policy is infinitely more complicated.</p>
<p>I suppose the issue boils down to leadership &#8211; to create great policy, you have to have a great leader that inspires the policymakers. Leadership provided, ultimately, by one person. I think, as you suggest, blogs break down and devolve the issue into so many little pieces and opinions that it&#8217;s improbable that one person (or even a committee) could to put it all back together again. That being said, the feedback provided via blogs can definitely, in broad strokes, provide insight into issues that, as Jonathan says, &#8220;resonate with their constituents&#8221;.</p>
<p>See you in January!<br />
M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Forde</title>
		<link>http://www.webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5746</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Forde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/#comment-5746</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t make it out last night, that Boyd guy always &quot;stirring the pot&quot; unlike me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t make it out last night, that Boyd guy always &#8220;stirring the pot&#8221; unlike me <img src='http://www.webwalker.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5734</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webwalker.ca/2006/11/29/throng-4/#comment-5734</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a good evening. Sorry I missed it. 

Very interesting discussion on blogs and public policy. I think you&#039;ve largely hit the mark with your thoughts. The one thing I might challenge is the too many chefs notion re generating public policy. Shrewd politicians would use blogs as a way to gather ongoing insight into issues that resonate with their constituents. The inclusive &amp; participatory nature of blogging would be helpful in giving voters a stronger sense of involvement in the process (the new plebiscites).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a good evening. Sorry I missed it. </p>
<p>Very interesting discussion on blogs and public policy. I think you&#8217;ve largely hit the mark with your thoughts. The one thing I might challenge is the too many chefs notion re generating public policy. Shrewd politicians would use blogs as a way to gather ongoing insight into issues that resonate with their constituents. The inclusive &amp; participatory nature of blogging would be helpful in giving voters a stronger sense of involvement in the process (the new plebiscites).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
